Eu4 ideal army composition.

Here, a minimum of 4 cavalry units (2 on each side) is required. The dynamic changes for the last time at level 30, where 6 cavalry units will be required for maximize flanking. For example: Early game: 8 infantry, 2 cavalry, 5 artillery. Mid game: 18 infantry, 2 cavalry, 10 artillery.They are simply too pricy and not worth it, unless the situation is dire in the lategame and you need a 10/4/10 stack to win the war ASAP. If you do that, I suggest you delete everything but infantry once you are done, because again, it is most likely going to be a huge strain on your economy. For army compositions, refer to a spreadsheet ...[Army] Give Ruler Military Command [Army] Give Heir Military Command [Army] Field one of your armies with 20 Infantry and 4 Cavalry. [Army] Field the other army with 11 Infantry and 4 Cavalry. [Navy] Select your Barques Fleet and add more 3 Barques. Then send them to Protect Trade on Sevilla.At 40 combat width, undisputed optimal army composition is 32-8-40. This is making some assumptions about having a reinforcement stack nearby if you happen to engage an equal size stack. Less than 40 combat width, which means lower miltech and therefore lower supply limits is more disputed.

If my enemy army has 10 regiments in the front row, I use a 10 infantry and 2 cavalry army. Once I unlock artillery, for all of my armies I use a 12/2/6 stack. The 6 artillery provides a +5 bonus to sieges on a level 1 fort, a +3 bonus on level 2 forts, a +2 on level 3 forts, and you can combine two stacks to get a +3 bonus on level 4 forts.Search Results related to eu4 military doctrines and organization on Search EngineOverall, as long as the first army isn't crushed, you should be fine. And now that I've thought about it, going 12/8/10 or 10/10/10 should be fine for the PLC, simply because they can do so without incurring the insufficient support modifier as easily as a western nation might. With the PLC, (especially a Polish-led PLC) cavalry can reach up to ...

Eventually I am thinking i'll get Quality for my fourth idea just to make my army/navy stronger but I had a question. After my recent multi-army stack wipe from the Ottomans even with French support I am concerned I might not be building my armies properly. Currently I just did 15 infantry/5 Cavalry/5 Artillery. Is there a better composition?Hi everyone, bit excited after finishing my first WC. I'm a pretty decent player I think, but I've always kept away from doing WCs because I hate micromanagement, rebels, playing on slow speeds, cheap tactics like client states and truce breaks, and I think the entire merc system in EU4 is unrealistic, ahistorical, and spoils what is otherwise an almost perfect game.

What should Qing army comp be? I just formed Qing in 1590 after conquering fully conquering Ming and claiming the Mandate. My army comp right now is 13/31/20 more or less. It's not very refined but I'm RPing and I thought it would make sense if it wasn't exact as a horde. Anyway, I'm now in chinese tech group and have 50/50 cavalry support ratio.The "Ideal" army composistion late game is enough cannons to fill the back row, so whatever your combat width is. Then 6 or 4 calvary units for flanking attacks, then just infantry afterwards. For a 30 stack, I normally will run 16-4-10. Reply.What I usually do is have as many cannons as it takes for the full +5 to sieging and have the same number of infantry. That's what I consider 1 army. I'll have those armies working in teams of two. Regardless of how you do it always have a full back line of cannons. Replace the cav with more infantry. I have 40 combat width, does that mean it ...Optimal damage-maximizing composition is based on the Combat Width (CW) value. The ideal scenario is having the full CW value worth of artillery (back row) and the CW value worth of infantry, minus X number of cav regiments. X is the (flanking range of cavalry)*2, one set of full flanking range cav on each flank.

MrCard-Gaming. •. Depends on what you want to do. You are in a decent position for almost anything: Protestant HRE, HRE dismantle, Semi tall with Lubeck, Very wide with religious into Russia, Colonial, wtv anything can work with Sweden since you have good ideas and events, good position and lack of missions to steer you one way. For military ...

Combat width - 2/4 infantry, combat width artillery, 2/4 cavalry. 3. Parakoto. • 10 yr. ago. Just add a pinch more horses, to gain a better use of your wrecking balls. 1. oblio-. • 10 yr. ago. He probably has a ton of manpower and the cheapest infantry in the game.

If you're at 63% Cavalry Combat Bonus that means that you're infantry has 20% Infantry Combat Bonus (Piechota Wybraniecka & Quality Ideas), what if I go half and half with a full combat width of Artillery. 63% Cavalry Combat Ability seems like it would chew through their flanks in no time. I use 8:8:8.Ttttttitle edit: *ideal. Same as western. Full combat width of arty with full combat width of junk in front, plus extra to avoid casualties creating flanking...and a couple cavalry to do flanking of your own if they're not at full CW.Seeing as Hungary has money issues already, the Black Army is useless. I took the other option. I could see it being kind of good in the Age of Reformation, with the 5% merc discipline splendor thing. That plus offensive ideas and your third NI is 25% discipline on your mercs.16/4/20. If I'm not mistaken, the optimal army composition consists of your combat width full of artillery, 40% of the width of cavalry and then 60% multiplied by 1.5 the width of infantry. So basically, if your combat width is 20, you should have 20 artillery, 8 cavalry and 18 infantry. 6:4 cav/artillery for Polish horde.As the title says, what's the best or a good army composition in the current patch, by late game i have big armies of like 30-40k each and i was just wondering how many infantry, cav and arty are good to have in a stack, and if possible what the best units might be for infantry, i usually go with very offensive units.Army composition? I have been playing for a little while now but recently i did a cusco run and got my balls twisted by the rebels and im wondering if it's because of my army template? I usually have 10/5/0 in the beginning of runs until i unlock artillary and i switch to 15/5/10 and the first idea tree i go for is usually offensive.

The only factor in which specificity of country plays into ideal army composition is cavalry ratio. Vijayanagar is Indian tech group, which has a 50% "max" cavalry ratio, meaning if you have 6 infantry regiments in a stack, any more than 3 cavalry regiments in that same stack will earn you a penalty for being over the max optimal ratio.R5: u/covya and I did some testing for a Custom Nations MP game and we found a way to full annex Ming with free cores on all of China. You start as a Shinto theocracy and get the " Open Public Elections " reform with Militarists in power. Combine that with the two national ideas shown and by taking the mandate you can full annex Ming.Thanks for the replies everyone. Can't say I'm certain what composition I'm more comfortable with. I liked the 3/1/2 because of the aforementioned carpet sieging as well as the plentiful number of infantry compared to cavalry; I tend to be quite paranoid about running the risk of having too few infantry to support my cavalry after particularly heavy battles, and I also often like to construct ...Tech 1-16: 4 cavalry and the rest of combat width of infantry. Tech 7: add at least 1 cannon to the fighting stack, to get +1 at siege. You may additionally make 10/0/10 siege stack, not for fighting and just for fast siege of forts level 1-3, since they are the most common. 10 infantry may be replaced with 10-16 infantry mercenaries.Then mutiply the result by your current combat width. Create that many cavalry. Then take combat width and subtract the cavalry number for infantry. Then create artillery equal to combat width. The result is the ideal composition with a buffer. You can then reduce the army size by maintaining the ratio you just created.

11/4/5 alternative: 16/4/0 depends on if you want to siege fast or have a stronger army 16/4/10 21/4/15 26/4/20 26/4/25 As the force limit goes up in all provinces I expand the comp further. It doesn't help to run around with a 40 stack when you can't march anywhere because the force limit is 30 normally.An ideal Army Composition is to have all infantry at the start of the game since cavalry costs a lot. The first round of artillery you unlock they're not very good but are useful and when sieging they've extremely useful. ... With that, we wrap up our comprehensive guide on EU4 Army Composition. This concluded look highlights the key ...

Sure, in terms of pure damage to the enemy, a big army with full row will have optimized damage, however, you must also take morale damage into consideration, so that's why having a bit of reserved troops can help a lot in equal-strength fights. 2. KuntaStillSingle. Ideal Army composition for Russia? I'm playing Extended Timeline, using 50.000-men stacks, on the 2010s.In your sheet I can see in the army ideal composition number of infantry, cavalry and cannols by military level, and that's awesome. ... Europa Universalis, Imperator: Rome, Crusader Kings, Hearts of Iron, Victoria and Cities: Skylines. Members Online. Arumba explains why EU4 cavalry are bad and how to make them better youtube. upvotes ...If memory serves right, in 1650 your combat width should be around 32. So a good army composition might be 32 front row infantry + 8 spare units = 40 infantry and 21 artillery to get the maximum siege bonus on a star fort capital (level 6 + 1). You can go all the way up to 32 artillery, if you can afford that.In sports, body composition refers to the overall weight and size of an athlete and the proportion of that weight made up of muscle, fat or bone. Body composition is important in n...This is why i mentioned the additional stack of pure infantry. The ideal army is exactly combat width (fron and back row) and the bonus infantry is for instant covering of infantry loses for the next battle. I guess you can make a stack 50/0/40 for 40 combat width, so the backups infantry in already inside. But filling the backrow is optimalA case can be made for 4 units of cavalry per stack only if you are both rich (which Brandenburg isn't) and lack manpower (which shouldn't happen either) in order to conserve manpower (at the cost of more army maintenance) when defeating stacks that are smaller than yours and smaller than the combat width.4. Sweet-Molasses-3059. • 3 yr. ago. So by the time the bonuses kick in (ideas,traditions etc) you won't have 20 combat width. You want to start with 4 cav, then look at your flanking ability, this would be 25%,50% or 0% at the early stages of the game. You want to add 2 cav per 25% flanking ability and the rest infantry.

It depends a little on the situation, but I generally avoid fixed army compositions. For the most part, I will aim have about three siege-focused stacks with inf = art, the size of which is enough to siege a fort with a +5 bonus (11 in the early game), combined with a fourth field army that consists of infantry and twice flanking range of cavalry and in total has full …

If you're at 63% Cavalry Combat Bonus that means that you're infantry has 20% Infantry Combat Bonus (Piechota Wybraniecka & Quality Ideas), what if I go half and half with a full combat width of Artillery. 63% Cavalry Combat Ability seems like it would chew through their flanks in no time. I use 8:8:8.

This is why i mentioned the additional stack of pure infantry. The ideal army is exactly combat width (fron and back row) and the bonus infantry is for instant covering of infantry loses for the next battle. I guess you can make a stack 50/0/40 for 40 combat width, so the backups infantry in already inside. But filling the backrow is optimalCombat width is the limiter here, and I believe the flanking bonus is worth it to have at least 4 horsemen (I run 6 in case one or two get wiped in a battle). The rest is infantry and artillery. 3. I know the the optimal army compositions for normal Western countries, but my question is should it be different for the Prussians? Would an army….Honestly unless you're a horde, your army won't be super different in composition from a standard army even with the cav bonuses. For a normal army you should have 4 cav in a full fighting stack. for Poland it should be more, so from 6 to 10. Don't go to the cav/inf ratio, because infantry dies more and you will have the tactics penalty. Edit: So from what I read the ideal composition should be 16 inf, 4 cav, 20 arty. 4 cavalry because more is useless, infantry to fill the numbers and 20 artillery because you have to have the same number of arty and frontline units for balanced damage and morale. Archived post. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. 5. 24 Share. Google "eu4 ideal army composition excel sheet" to get the idea of how many artillery you need for each tech. You gonna need to separate them during peace and attack them together since attrition will be terrible if you use it all at once all the time. What i do if i feel lazy is this: At the beginning 16-4-0.Lets say its the part of the game where you should start shifting over to artillery, Tech 13 I believe. What is your preferred army template? I use 4 Inf, 2 Cav, 4 Artillery. For intents and purposes this is for nations that dont really have unit bonuses, so not Poland/Hungary/Hordes or whoever that Eastern European nation is with the good …Ideal army composition and unit types in eu4 Sheet1 Ideal army composition for every tech Mil tech,Combat width,Infantry,Cavalry,Cannons,Total,Comments 0,15,17,4,0,21 ...Since EU3 I've always been bad at figuring out exactly what sort of army compositions I should use. I started visiting this forum after I got EU4 and I've seen several helpful posts and discussions on this sub-reddit explaining optimal army composition and formations. If I've understood the mechanics correctly, the ideal is:Ideal Army Composition. 123456798. Jul 18, 2018. Jump to latest Follow Reply. Im currently playing as Russia and Im wondering how I should organize my massive military. I know of the spreadsheet except it recommends over 60 regiments...Manchu cavy/arty-only army composition idea. Hello guys, so i currently have a good Manchu campaign going and yesterday stumbled across Siu King's YT video in which he stackwipes anybody as Sunni QQ having 60% cavalry combat ability, 85% cavalry to infantry ratio and 6/6/6/6 Generals while his armies consist only of cavalry and artillery.Sure, in terms of pure damage to the enemy, a big army with full row will have optimized damage, however, you must also take morale damage into consideration, so that's why having a bit of reserved troops can help a lot in equal-strength fights. 2. KuntaStillSingle.

Also, the "ideal" army has full combat-width cannons as soon as they are invented. Sure, they do crap damage until around mil16, but any damage is more than 0 when we're talking about the ideal composition. Also, artillery don't "outdamage" infantry until mil25 from the backrow, but that obviously shouldn't stop you from having a full backrow ...Less short answer: To optimize your army composition get as many infantry and cavalry to fill your front line first, around 4 cav is fine, this number increases with greater flanking range. Get lots of cannons starting from tech 16, at the very least 1/3 of your army, closer to 1/2 your army.Combat width - 2/4 infantry, combat width artillery, 2/4 cavalry. 3. Parakoto. • 10 yr. ago. Just add a pinch more horses, to gain a better use of your wrecking balls. 1. oblio-. • 10 yr. ago. He probably has a ton of manpower and the cheapest infantry in the game.Instagram:https://instagram. 1982 quarter dollar valuelove calculator by ageamazon careers fresnoduffy boats for sale craigslist I am doing more or less fine in my second game and have learned to go after separated stacks, use terrain to my advantage and allocate generals…Feel free to send us your Webtoon Wallpaper we will select the best ones and publish them on this page. 1920x1080 Download Dice Manga Webtoon Wallpaper. marshmallow cat battle catsbf3 lewis dot The ideal composition is combat width+/2/combat width. Usually you struggle to afford that straight away so you need to fill the front line first before filling out with cannons (so many new players see n/2/n compositions and end up with 10/2/10 stacks getting annihilated by 15/5/3 stacks).However, most people will pick one of two sides: never buy cavalry or always have at least [2 or 4]. Whichever side you choose, know that there are people out there adamant that you are wrong. I have written below for the OPTIMAL army composition. Which ignores the main reason cavalry detractors refuse to use cavalry (waste of money). So... fairburn hobgood palmer library Nahuatl just gets -2 unrest. A bunch of countries get ideas that give more tolerance though not terribly many are ideal WC candidates. And there's government types. Legitimacy can give +1 to all tolerances (which pairs wonderfully with -3 unrest from legitimacy and possibly another -1 unrest from kingdom type). ... r/eu4 • Ideal army ...Combat width is the limiter here, and I believe the flanking bonus is worth it to have at least 4 horsemen (I run 6 in case one or two get wiped in a battle). The rest is infantry and artillery. 3. I know the the optimal army compositions for normal Western countries, but my question is should it be different for the Prussians? Would an army….